As promised here's my interview with Jeff Cohen, Editor of Mystery Morgue and head honcho for Murder by Committee.
Blooking Central: In your first response, Jeff, you mentioned that "the tough part lately has been getting authors interested in contributing to a project that requires them to read 30 chapters and write another in the space of a couple of weeks." I'm really curious about why they would have so little time to write?
Jeff Cohen: Mystery Morgue posts on the first of the month. That means I have to have all my copy in by, generously, the 25th. The new author has to read all the chapters (including the one just posted by the last
author, probably on the 25th or later) and write their own, in time
to meet our posting deadline. So it doesn't leave a lot of time.
BC: What can you tell me about the assignment or direction(s) that you have given your authors? Is there a word-minimum, for instance?
JC: I gave them no parameters at all. Write what you want, we generally aim at around 1,000 words, but feel free to go shorter or longer as the spirit moves you. In the beginning, we started with the idea of the author writing in the style of someone who inspired them to write, but most authors didn't get that, or weren't interested, so we abandoned it pretty quickly.
BC: Could you imagine a similar but smaller project that might have been more successful?
JC: It might have been best to have a definite end date, to say there would be twelve chapters, one year, and end it, and then start another the following year, maybe. As it was, the story went so insane that it was impossible to turn it into anything but a diversion for the author and the reader. I have no idea what it's about now.
BC: Any idea on statistics for readers?
JC: None. I'm not in charge of that. Sue or PJ might know. My guess is: not millions.
BC: Did you start with an outline? Or is everyone making the plot up as they go? How are you going to bring it to a conclusion?
JC: We started with a chapter written by Julia Spencer-Fleming (All Mortal Flesh) for a novel she never wrote. Julia was kind enough to hand it over to me, and I spun it off to the 29 other authors who contributed to the madness. How am I going to bring it to a conclusion? That's an excellent question. I wish I knew.
BC: Why would an author want to participate?
JC: For the free publicity; for the chance to write any damn thing they want. To be associated with the other authors who have participated. For fun.
BC: You said you hadn't considered publishing, but surely since self-publishing with Lulu is free, a book should at least be up for consideration, yes?
JC: No. Getting clearances from all 30 authors would be a nightmare, and I don't know that it could be edited into something coherent.
***
I appreciate Cohen taking the time to give us his perspective. Now I'd like to ask you, Blook Folk, what do you think might have made this project successful? I guess I'm defining successful as something that has continuity and can be brought to a satisfactory conclusion. Would an outline have helped? Was there a way to work ahead of the schedule do you think?Part 3 will include a mini-interview with the Great She Elephant and continues the discussion of collaborative online fiction.